![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
http://www.vox.com/2015/11/27/9771784/hamilton-cabinet-battle-debt
Teaser:
Teaser:
The net impact of Miranda's rendition of the dispute is to render Hamilton as a more progressive-friendly figure and Jefferson as a more straightforwardly conservative one. Jefferson complains that Hamilton's text is too long, echoing Republican criticisms of Barack Obama's key legislative initiatives, and objects generically to taxes — again, sounding like a modern Republican — without raising the point that 18th-century taxes hit the poor more heavily than the rich.
This is part of a larger shift in the trajectory of how American history is understood. [...]
Miranda's Hamilton so perfectly matches the sensibilities of mainstream Obama-era Democrats that the Democratic National Committee turned an early November Hamilton performance into a fundraiser.
And it reflects an ongoing, albeit somewhat subtle, split among contemporary Democrats.
no subject
Date: 2015-11-27 09:52 pm (UTC)I don't agree that the lines are clearly drawn as Hamilton=liberal and Jefferson=conservative in either Chernow's book (which I've just finished) or the musical. It's a lot more nuanced than that, even in the musical - yes, Jefferson's poking fun at "too many damn pages" echos modern politics, but so does everything in The Election of 1800 - I think LMM is not so much drawing lines as pointing out that the machinery of politics hasn't changed much in 200 years.
no subject
Date: 2015-11-27 11:15 pm (UTC)